enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Scholarly sources and high-quality non-scholarly sources are generally better than news reports for academic topics (see § Scholarship, above). Press releases from organizations or journals are often used by newspapers with minimal change; such sources are churnalism and should not be treated differently than the underlying press release.

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    This page provides examples of what editors on Wikipedia have assessed to be a reliable source. The advice is not, and cannot be, comprehensive, and should be used primarily to inform discussion in an article talk page with respect to sources. Exceptions can naturally be made using common sense, in order to reach a collaborative conclusion ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Age of the source and rate of change of the subject—Where a subject has evolved or changed over time a long standing source may not be accurate with respect to the current situation. To interpret utility one must appreciate how the subject has changed and has that change impacted any of the salient points of the source information.

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (history)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the descriptive label historian to refer to an historian.

  7. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  8. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    If available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources on topics such as history, medicine, and science. Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include: University-level textbooks

  9. Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tiers_of_reliability

    Peer-reviewed articles in academic journals; Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and other review articles; Peer-reviewed conference papers; Examples: Malawey, Victoria (2014).