Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Scholarly sources and high-quality non-scholarly sources are generally better than news reports for academic topics (see § Scholarship, above). Press releases from organizations or journals are often used by newspapers with minimal change; such sources are churnalism and should not be treated differently than the underlying press release.
Numerous media sources in specific countries point to particular worries about the data from several countries, and the Wikipedia editing generally follows the usual pattern of judging the reliability of particular media sources, doctors' statements, citizens' groups statements, rather than relying on government agencies' statements alone.
The general public mostly gets its history from novels, films, TV shows, or tour guides at various sites. These sources are full of rumor and gossip and false or exaggerated tales. They tend to present rosy-colored histories in which the well-known names are portrayed heroically. Almost always editors can find much more authoritative sources.
Examples of self-published sources. Almost all websites except for those published by traditional publishers (such as news media organizations), including: Blogs; Web forums; Wikis; Social networking sites like Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, and LinkedIn; Sites with user-generated content, including YouTube, Tik Tok, and Find A Grave
A variety of source types will be appropriate for most articles, and the type of source appropriate in one part of an article may be different from the type of source that is appropriate for a different part of the article. It is a third-party or independent source, with no significant financial or other conflict of interest.
A number of scholarly works. His article lists some of them. He's written a textbook and a few other books. Judging just by the titles these look to be high-end general-interest books for the educated layman. Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works? Yes, some.
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the descriptive label historian to refer to an historian.