Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The reforms drew heavy scrutiny from opposition leaders. The New Industrial Policy and 1991 Budget was decried by opposition leaders as "command budget from the IMF" and worried that withdrawal of subsidies for fertilizers and hikes in oil prices would harm lower and middle-class citizens. [27]
The foreign exchange reserves by 1991 had dried up to the point that India could barely finance three weeks worth of imports. [20] In mid-1991, India's exchange rate was subjected to a severe adjustment. This event began with a slide in the value of the Indian rupee leading up to mid-1991.
A country's infrastructure (including transportation, telecommunications and energy industry) is a major enabler of industrial policy. [6] Industrial policies are interventionist measures typical of mixed economy countries. Many types of industrial policies contain common elements with other types of interventionist practices such as trade ...
A new industrial policy was tabled in Parliament on 24 July 1991 aiming to maintain growth in productivity and gainful employment and to encourage the growth of entrepreneurship and upgrades to technology. [3] That year the SICA was amended to include public sector enterprises in the board's purview. [4]
Events in the year 1991 in the Republic of India. The year 1991 was a watershed moment in the history of Economy of India . It was the year in which India formally announced its shift towards Liberalization , Privatization and Globalization from hitherto existed Mixed economy that was predominantly a Planned economy .
The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) is a central government department under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry in India. It is responsible for formulation and implementation of promotional and developmental measures for growth of the industrial sector, keeping in view the national priorities and socio-economic objectives.
The Committee submitted its report to the Finance Minister in November 1991 which was tabled in Parliament on 17 December 1991. [6] The Narasimham-II Committee was tasked with the progress review of the implementation of the banking reforms since 1992 with the aim of further strengthening the financial institutions of India. [4]
This government-led industrial policy, with corresponding restrictions on private enterprise, was the dominant pattern of Indian economic development until the 1991 Indian economic crisis. [15] After the crisis, the government began divesting its ownership of several PSUs to raise capital and privatize companies facing poor financial ...