Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The example mapping f happens to correspond to the example enumeration s in the picture above. A generalized form of the diagonal argument was used by Cantor to prove Cantor's theorem: for every set S, the power set of S—that is, the set of all subsets of S (here written as P(S))—cannot be in bijection with S itself. This proof proceeds as ...
Cantor's theorem and its proof are closely related to two paradoxes of set theory. Cantor's paradox is the name given to a contradiction following from Cantor's theorem together with the assumption that there is a set containing all sets, the universal set. In order to distinguish this paradox from the next one discussed below, it is important ...
The graphical shape of Cantor's pairing function, a diagonal progression, is a standard trick in working with infinite sequences and countability. [b] The algebraic rules of this diagonal-shaped function can verify its validity for a range of polynomials, of which a quadratic will turn out to be the simplest, using the method of induction ...
The answer is yes, because for every natural number n there is a square number n 2, and likewise the other way around. The answer is no, because the squares are a proper subset of the naturals: every square is a natural number but there are natural numbers, like 2, which are not squares of natural numbers.
This theorem is proved using Cantor's first uncountability proof, which differs from the more familiar proof using his diagonal argument. The title of the article, " On a Property of the Collection of All Real Algebraic Numbers " ("Ueber eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen"), refers to its first theorem: the set ...
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.
Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem (set theory, cardinal numbers) Cantor's intersection theorem (real analysis) Cantor's isomorphism theorem (order theory) Cantor's theorem (set theory, Cantor's diagonal argument) Carathéodory–Jacobi–Lie theorem (symplectic topology) Carathéodory's existence theorem (ordinary differential equations)
Later, in 1891, Cantor used his more familiar diagonal argument to prove the same result. [17] While Cantor's result is often quoted as being purely existential and thus unusable for constructing a single transcendental number, [18] [19] the proofs in both the aforementioned papers give methods to construct transcendental numbers. [20]