Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The "second-order cone" in SOCP arises from the constraints, which are equivalent to requiring the affine function (+, +) to lie in the second-order cone in +. [ 1 ] SOCPs can be solved by interior point methods [ 2 ] and in general, can be solved more efficiently than semidefinite programming (SDP) problems. [ 3 ]
There are two main relaxations of QCQP: using semidefinite programming (SDP), and using the reformulation-linearization technique (RLT). For some classes of QCQP problems (precisely, QCQPs with zero diagonal elements in the data matrices), second-order cone programming (SOCP) and linear programming (LP) relaxations providing the same objective value as the SDP relaxation are available.
Examples of include the positive orthant + = {:}, positive semidefinite matrices +, and the second-order cone {(,): ‖ ‖}. Often f {\displaystyle f\ } is a linear function, in which case the conic optimization problem reduces to a linear program , a semidefinite program , and a second order cone program , respectively.
[1] [2] In effect, it is a constant for each value of t. In the more general case, any nonhomogeneous source function in any variable can be described as a forcing function, and the resulting solution can often be determined using a superposition of linear combinations of the homogeneous solutions and the forcing term.
An example of MUSCL type state parabolic-reconstruction. It is possible to extend the idea of linear-extrapolation to higher order reconstruction, and an example is shown in the diagram opposite. However, for this case the left and right states are estimated by interpolation of a second-order, upwind biased, difference equation.
In LP, the objective and constraint functions are all linear. Quadratic programming are the next-simplest. In QP, the constraints are all linear, but the objective may be a convex quadratic function. Second order cone programming are more general. Semidefinite programming are more general. Conic optimization are even more general - see figure ...
Equivalently, the second-order conditions that are sufficient for a local minimum or maximum can be expressed in terms of the sequence of principal (upper-leftmost) minors (determinants of sub-matrices) of the Hessian; these conditions are a special case of those given in the next section for bordered Hessians for constrained optimization—the ...
Consider the following nonlinear optimization problem in standard form: . minimize () subject to (),() =where is the optimization variable chosen from a convex subset of , is the objective or utility function, (=, …,) are the inequality constraint functions and (=, …,) are the equality constraint functions.