Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Legal andjudicial opinions. A dissenting opinion (or dissent) is an opinion in a legal case in certain legal systems written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion of the court which gives rise to its judgment. Dissenting opinions are normally written at the same time as the majority opinion and any concurring ...
Dissent is an opinion, philosophy or sentiment of non-agreement or opposition to a prevailing idea or policy enforced under the authority of a government, political party or other entity or individual. A dissenting person may be referred to as a dissenter.
Seriatim opinion. v. t. e. In law, a per curiam decision or opinion (sometimes called an unsigned opinion) is one that is not authored by or attributed to a specific judge, but rather to the entire court or panel of judges who heard the case. [1] The term per curiam is Latin for 'by the court'. [2]
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Obiter dictum. Obiter dictum (usually used in the plural, obiter dicta) is a Latin phrase meaning "other things said", [1] that is, a remark in a legal opinion that is "said in passing" by any judge or arbitrator. It is a concept derived from English common law, whereby a judgment comprises only two elements: ratio decidendi and obiter dicta.
the right to receive information and ideas; the right to impart information and ideas. International, regional and national standards also recognise that freedom of speech, as the freedom of expression, includes any medium, whether orally, in writing, in print, through the internet or art forms.
Only the opinion of the majority judgment is considered to have precedent-setting weight. Some examples of opinions within judgments include: Majority opinion: the opinion of more than half of the judges deciding a case. [25] This opinion becomes precedent for future cases as it represents the views of the majority of the court.
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito responded to the dissent opinion's concerns, saying that the ruling would not affect other substantive due process cases. [ 91 ] [ 92 ] [ 90 ] In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas , wrote, "In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents ...