enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Willard Van Orman Quine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willard_Van_Orman_Quine

    Willard Van Orman Quine (/ kwaɪn /; known to his friends as "Van"; [9] June 25, 1908 – December 25, 2000) was an American philosopher and logician in the analytic tradition, recognized as "one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century". [10] He served as the Edgar Pierce Chair of Philosophy at Harvard University from 1956 ...

  3. Two Dogmas of Empiricism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Dogmas_of_Empiricism

    Two Dogmas of Empiricism. " Two Dogmas of Empiricism " is a paper by analytic philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine published in 1951. According to University of Sydney professor of philosophy Peter Godfrey-Smith, this "paper [is] sometimes regarded as the most important in all of twentieth-century philosophy ". [1]

  4. Philosophy of logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_logic

    Philosophy of logic is the area of philosophy that studies the scope and nature of logic. It investigates the philosophical problems raised by logic, such as the presuppositions often implicitly at work in theories of logic and in their application. This involves questions about how logic is to be defined and how different logical systems are ...

  5. Quine–Putnam indispensability argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quine–Putnam...

    Quine–Putnam indispensability argument. The Quine–Putnam indispensability argument[a] is an argument in the philosophy of mathematics for the existence of abstract mathematical objects such as numbers and sets, a position known as mathematical platonism. It was named after the philosophers Willard Quine and Hilary Putnam, and is one of the ...

  6. Analytic–synthetic distinction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic–synthetic...

    While Quine's rejection of the analytic–synthetic distinction is widely known, the precise argument for the rejection and its status is highly debated in contemporary philosophy. However, some (for example, Paul Boghossian) [16] argue that Quine's rejection of the distinction is still widely accepted among philosophers, even if for poor reasons.

  7. Word and Object - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_and_Object

    0-262-67001-1. Word and Object is a 1960 work by the philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine, in which the author expands upon the line of thought of his earlier writings in From a Logical Point of View (1953), and reformulates some of his earlier arguments, such as his attack in "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" on the analytic–synthetic distinction ...

  8. Naturalized epistemology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalized_epistemology

    Naturalized epistemology (a term coined by W. V. O. Quine) is a collection of philosophic views about the theory of knowledge that emphasize the role of natural scientific methods. This shared emphasis on scientific methods of studying knowledge shifts the focus of epistemology away from many traditional philosophical questions, and towards the ...

  9. Is Logic Empirical? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is_Logic_Empirical?

    In Philosophy of Logic (the chapter titled "Deviant Logics"), Quine rejects the idea that classical logic should be revised in response to the paradoxes, being concerned with "a serious loss of simplicity", and "the handicap of having to think within a deviant logic". Quine, though, stood by his claim that logic is in principle not immune to ...