enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Photography and the law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_law

    In some public property owned by government, such as law courts, [82] government buildings, libraries, civic centres [83] [84] and some of the museums in Hong Kong, photography is not allowed without permission from the government. It is illegal to equip or take photographs and recording in a place of public entertainment, such as cinemas and ...

  3. Personality rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights

    In addition to the general personality rights, there are special rules that forbid taking intimate pictures without consent (§ 184k StGB), and that forbid taking pictures which violate the "most personal sphere" of those pictured (§ 201 StGB - in particular, photos of private situations such as inside the bedroom, and photos of helpless ...

  4. Legality of recording by civilians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by...

    Signs posted around many bridges, including the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge, state that filming the structure is prohibited.The legality of such restrictions is problematic; in view of the First Amendment in the United States of America, restrictions on taking pictures of a public structure in public may be unconstitutional (in view of the fact that prohibiting taking pictures will probably ...

  5. Wikipedia:Image use policy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy

    When taking pictures of identifiable people, the subject's consent is not usually needed for straightforward photographs taken in a public place, but is often needed for photographs taken in a private place. This type of consent is sometimes called a model release, and it is unrelated to the photographer's copyright.

  6. August 21, 2024 at 11:06 AM. A Pennsylvania man has been accused of taking photographs and videos of a person involved in sex acts in their home and then distributing them on the internet ...

  7. Nussenzweig v. DiCorcia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nussenzweig_v._DiCorcia

    New York law prohibits the use of a person's likeness, without consent, "for advertising or for purposes of trade." DiCorcia and Pace/MacGill argued that the photograph represented "artistic expression", and was protected under the First Amendment and that the statute of limitations had expired for bringing a lawsuit. On February 8, 2006 the ...

  8. Google Street View privacy concerns - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Street_View_privacy...

    On February 3, 2009, Google Japan representatives attended a meeting about privacy concerns held at a Tokyo Metropolitan Government facility, and agreed that privacy issues had not been adequately considered. Google pledged that, before taking photographs for Street View, they would in future notify the provinces' local government.

  9. Street photography - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_photography

    In South Korea, taking pictures of women without their consent, even in public, is considered to be criminal sexual assault, punishable by a fine of up to 10 million won and up to 5 years imprisonment. [60] In July 2017 an amendment to the law was voted on in favour of allowing for chemical castration of people taking such photographs. [61]