enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Cooley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cooley

    Argued March 23, 2021 Decided June 1, 2021; Full case name: United States v. Cooley: Docket no. 19-1414: Argument: Oral argument: Holding; A tribal police officer may, with probable cause, detain and search non-Native people traveling on public roads through a reservation.

  3. Frazier v. Cupp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp

    Frazier appealed his conviction to the United States Supreme Court on three main points.. The defense argued Frazier was denied his Sixth Amendment right to cross-examine the prosecution's witness, Rawls, because Rawls refused to answer questions after the prosecution referenced elements from his prior statements to police.

  4. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond

    City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that police may not conduct vehicle searches, specifically ones involving drug-sniffing police dogs, at a checkpoint or roadblock without reasonable suspicion. [2]

  5. Supreme Court rules against convicted drug mule who claimed ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-rules-against...

    The Supreme Court ruled against a convicted drug mule from California who objected to evidence admitted at her trial that suggested she would have been aware of thousands of dollars worth of ...

  6. Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Department_of...

    Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints. The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure." However, upon remand to the Michigan Supreme Court, that court held ...

  7. Illinois v. Caballes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Caballes

    Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.

  8. Musk, Ramaswamy will lean on Supreme Court rulings to cut US ...

    www.aol.com/news/musk-ramaswamy-plan-lean...

    With an electoral mandate and the 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, Musk and Ramaswamy said, their panel has an opportunity to enact substantial structural downsizing within the ...

  9. List of firearm court cases in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_firearm_court...

    Firearm case law in the United States is based on decisions of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Each of these decisions deals with the Second Amendment (which is a part of the Bill of Rights ), the right to keep and bear arms , the Commerce Clause , the General Welfare Clause , and/or other federal firearms laws.