enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intelligence source and information reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_source_and...

    The source reliability is rated between A (history of complete reliability) to E (history of invalid information), with F for source without sufficient history to establish reliability level. The information content is rated between 1 (confirmed) to 5 (improbable), with 6 for information whose reliability can not be evaluated.

  3. Likert scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likert_scale

    In fact, there may also appear phenomena which even question the ordinal scale level in Likert scales. [21] For example, in a set of items A, B, C rated with a Likert scale circular relations like A > B, B > C and C > A can appear. This violates the axiom of transitivity for the ordinal scale.

  4. Rating scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rating_scale

    A rating scale is a set of categories designed to obtain information about a quantitative or a qualitative attribute. In the social sciences , particularly psychology , common examples are the Likert response scale and 0-10 rating scales, where a person selects the number that reflecting the perceived quality of a product .

  5. Scale (social sciences) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale_(social_sciences)

    Stapel scale – This is a unipolar ten-point rating scale. It ranges from +5 to −5 and has no neutral zero point. Thurstone scale – This is a scaling technique that incorporates the intensity structure among indicators. Mathematically derived scale – Researchers infer respondents’ evaluations mathematically.

  6. Choice modelling - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_modelling

    variant personal scales. Different individuals value a '2' on a scale of 1 to 5 differently. Aggregation of the frequencies of each of the scale measures has no theoretical basis. no relative measure. How does an analyst compare something rated a 1 to something rated a 2? Is one twice as good as the other?

  7. Analytic confidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_confidence

    Moderate confidence generally means credibly sourced and plausible information, but not of sufficient quality or corroboration to warrant a higher level of confidence. [1] Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences ...

  8. Polytomous Rasch model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytomous_Rasch_model

    In the example shown in Figure 1, the threshold locations are −1.5, −0.5, 0.5, and 1.5 respectively. Respondents may obtain scores in many different ways. For example, where Likert response formats are employed, Strongly Disagree may be assigned 0, Disagree a 1, Agree a 2, and Strongly Agree a 3.

  9. Behaviorally anchored rating scales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorally_anchored...

    Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) are scales used to rate performance.BARS are normally presented vertically with scale points ranging from five to nine. It is an appraisal method that aims to combine the benefits of narratives, critical incidents, and quantified ratings by anchoring a quantified scale with specific narrative examples of good, moderate, and poor performance.