Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rogerian argument is an application of Rogers' ideas about communication, taught by rhetoric teachers who were inspired by Rapoport, [6] [7] but Rogers' ideas about communication have also been applied somewhat differently by many others: for example, Marshall Rosenberg created nonviolent communication, a process of conflict resolution and ...
The third kind of enthymeme consists of a syllogism with a missing premise that is supplied by the audience as an unstated assumption. In the words of rhetorician William Benoit, the missing premise is: "assumed by rhetor when inventing and by audience when understanding the argument." [8] Some examples of this kind of enthymeme are as follows:
Rogerian argument; Seduction; ... the Common Topics were a short list of four traditional topics regarded as suitable to structure an argument. ... example; synonyms;
The Rogerian method of argument involves each side restating the other's position to the satisfaction of the other, among other principles. [33] In a paper, it can be expressed by carefully acknowledging and understanding the opposition, rather than dismissing them.
Example of an early argument map, from Richard Whately's Elements of Logic (1852 edition). Argumentation theory is the interdisciplinary study of how conclusions can be supported or undermined by premises through logical reasoning.
The use of rhetoric enabled authors to discuss the same topic in several ways, to be little a great subject, and to accord greatness to something small, for example, or to renew the old, and express the new in an old-fashioned manner. [...] Using these formulas, a pupil could render the same subject or theme in a myriad of ways.
One of the arguments he makes revolves around the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision overturning the so-called “Chevron doctrine,” which allowed government agencies to make reasonable ...
For example, inferring the conclusion "no cats are frogs" from the premises "all frogs are amphibians" and "no cats are amphibians" is a sound argument. But even arguments with false premises can be deductively valid, like inferring that "no cats are frogs" from the premises "all frogs are mammals" and "no cats are mammals".