Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The content guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources makes these statements: The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source for that context.
Sources American News americannews.com Defunct Published a false story claiming actor Denzel Washington endorsed Donald Trump for U.S. president. The fictional headline led to thousands of people sharing it on Facebook, a prominent example of fake news spreading on the social network prior to the 2016 presidential election. [11] [12] [13] [14]
a list of sources that have never been discussed, or whose reliability should be obvious to most editors; a list of primary, secondary, or tertiary sources; a list of independent or affiliated sources; a list of self-published and non–self-published sources; a representative sample of all sources used on Wikipedia or all sources in existence
A source makes an exceptional claim that is not directly contradicted by any source, but if it were true would be very unlikely to only appear in that one source. Ninety-nine sources describe someone's career as a sculptor, while one source also mentions a successful poetry career, in a way that it would make no sense for the other ninety-nine ...
The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard.
John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the site has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, under which anyone can edit most articles, has led to concerns ...
If you see an article that may be inaccurate, you should do the following: Correct it yourself if you can. Add citations to reliable sources to verify the information. If the neutrality of the content is in question, see Wikipedia:NPOV dispute for more details about how to handle it. If only a few statements seem inaccurate, see Disputed statement.
The article cites sources that do not support the claim(s) made. [42] [56] For example, "quotes are abbreviated or taken out of context". [50] The article cites sources that are fictitious. [42] The article fabricates quotes. [50] The article makes a claim that is not covered in credible sources. [42] [50]