enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Communication strategies in second-language acquisition

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_strategies...

    This decade saw a flurry of papers describing and analyzing communication strategies, and saw Ellen Bialystok link communication strategies to her general theory of second-language acquisition. [6] There was more activity in the 1990s with a collection of papers by Kasper and Kellerman [ 7 ] and a review article by Dörnyei and Scott, [ 8 ] but ...

  3. Language acquisition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_acquisition

    Language acquisition is the process by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive and comprehend language. In other words, it is how human beings gain the ability to be aware of language, to understand it, and to produce and use words and sentences to communicate. Language acquisition involves structures, rules, and representation.

  4. Eve V. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eve_V._Clark

    Eve Vivienne Clark (born 26 July 1942) is a British-born American linguist. Clark's research focuses on first language acquisition, especially the acquisition of meaning. She has also worked on the acquisition and use of word-formation, including comparative studies of English and Hebrew in children and adul

  5. Theories of second-language acquisition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_second...

    Language learning, on the other hand, is studying, consciously and intentionally, the features of a language, as is common in traditional classrooms. Krashen sees these two processes as fundamentally different, with little or no interface between them. In common with connectionism, Krashen sees input as essential to language acquisition. [4]

  6. Input hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input_hypothesis

    The acquisitionlearning hypothesis claims that there is a strict separation between acquisition and learning; Krashen saw acquisition as a purely subconscious process and learning as a conscious process, and claimed that improvement in language ability was only dependent upon acquisition and never on learning.

  7. Second-language acquisition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-language_acquisition

    Stephen Krashen makes a distinction between language acquisition and language learning (the acquisitionlearning distinction), [47] claiming that acquisition is a subconscious process, whereas learning is a conscious one. According to this hypothesis, the acquisition process for L2 (Language 2) is the same as for L1 (Language 1) acquisition.

  8. Noticing hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noticing_hypothesis

    It is exclusive from attention and understanding, and has been criticized within the field of psychology and second language acquisition. Schmidt and Frota studied noticing in Schmidt as a Portuguese language learner and collected their findings through diary study and audio recordings. The hypothesis was modified in 1994 in light of criticism.

  9. Comprehension approach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehension_approach

    An advantage of the comprehension approach of language learning is the fact that when the learner eventually understands the meaning and the correct application of the words, the language will sound more effortless when he or she speaks it in contrast to other forms of language learning, which may result in more stilted efforts.