Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Empowerment evaluation was introduced in 1993 by David Fetterman during his presidential address at the American Evaluation Association’s (AEA) annual meeting. [1]The approach was initially well received by some researchers who commented on the complementary relationship between EE and community psychology, social work, community development and adult education.
Potential team: a group where a significant performance need exists and attempts are being made to improve performance. This group typically requires more clarity about purpose, goals or outcomes and needs more discipline. Real team: a group with complementary skills, equal commitment and is mutually accountable.
A group utilises information in their decision-making that has already been deemed inaccurate. Sunk cost bias A group remains committed to a given plan primarily due to the investment already made in that plan, regardless of how inefficient and/or ineffective it may have become. Extra-evidentiary bias
Democratic leadership, also known as participative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which members of the group take a more participative role in the decision-making process. Researchers have found that this leadership style is usually one of the most effective and leads to higher productivity, better contributions from group members ...
The consensus decision-making process often has several roles designed to make the process run more effectively. Although the name and nature of these roles varies from group to group, the most common are the facilitator, consensor, a timekeeper, an empath and a secretary or notes taker.
A group with a high level of role differentiation would be categorized as having many different roles that are specialized and narrowly defined. [53] A key role in a group is the leader, but there are other important roles as well, including task roles, relationship roles, and individual roles. [53]
When applied to cross-cultural settings, cultural and linguistic adaptations and group composition considerations are important to encourage greater participation in the group discussion. [36] The nominal group technique is similar to focus groups with a few important differences. The group often consists of experts in the field in question.
Free Resources for Program Evaluation and Social Research Methods This is a gateway to resources on program evaluation, how to, online guides, manuals, books on methods of evaluation and free software related to evaluation. Innovation Network A nonprofit organization working to share planning and evaluation tools and know-how. The organization ...