Ad
related to: is wikipedia a good article generator toolquillbot.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...
Before creating a draft article, you can practice by first editing in Wikipedia's community sandbox your personal sandbox. It's a great way to try out editing without affecting live articles. If you need some help along the way, see our guide to your first article
Wikipedia provides various editing tools, and you have a choice of what tool best suits your needs: Editing interface selector Source editor – edits the wikitext of the article, which uses some special characters, like adding [[brackets]] to create a link to another page, or asterisks to make bullet points.
A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...
You may also wish to read the reviewing Good articles guideline and an essay on what the Good article criteria are not. Reviewing guides from individual editors Different reviewers have slightly different approaches when conducting reviews and some have outlined theirs below.
Article creation is the process by which new articles are started, titled, formed, stubbed, categorized, and developed. See Help:Your first article . You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles — see the Article Wizard .
If the article does not meet the Good article criteria after the reviewer has waited a reasonable amount of time for the nominator to make improvements, the reviewer is sure to fail the nomination. Future article editors may benefit from review comments on how to improve the article. The nominator disagrees with the reviewer.
The Wikipedia articles concerning Scientology were edited by members of the group to improve its portrayal. [260] On August 25, 2010, the Toronto Star reported that the Canadian "government is now conducting two investigations into federal employees who have taken to Wikipedia to express their opinion on federal policies and bitter political ...
Ad
related to: is wikipedia a good article generator toolquillbot.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month