enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brewer v. Williams - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewer_v._Williams

    Brewer v. Williams , 430 U.S. 387 (1977), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes "waiver" of the right to counsel for the purposes of the Sixth Amendment. Under Miranda v.

  3. Assistance of Counsel Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assistance_of_Counsel_Clause

    As stated in Brewer v.Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the right to counsel "means at least that a person is entitled to the help of a lawyer at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, 'whether by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment. ' " [2] Brewer goes on to conclude that once adversarial proceedings have begun ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Brewer v. Williams: 430 U.S. 387 (1977) "Christian burial speech" case. Sixth Amendment requires criminal defendants to have counsel during police interrogation conducted after indictment Ingraham v. Wright: 430 U.S. 651 (1977) Corporal punishment of public school students Wooley v. Maynard: 430 U.S. 705 (1977)

  5. Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the...

    As stated in Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the right to counsel "[means] at least that a person is entitled to the help of a lawyer at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, whether by formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment."

  6. Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Reports/B

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S...

    United States v. Butler: 738 Williams v. Illinois: 739 Snowden v. Hughes: 740 Swidler & Berlin v. United States: 741 United States v. Dunn: 742 Republican Party of Minnesota v. White: 743 Washington State Dept. of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc. 744 Oregon v. Kennedy: 745 Stokeling v. United States: 746 International Ass'n of Machinists v. Street ...

  7. 'Just keep believing.' Read Caleb Williams' full Heisman ...

    www.aol.com/news/just-keep-believing-read-caleb...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Compulsory Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_Process_Clause

    However, in Taylor v. Illinois (1988), the Court rejected a challenge to witness preclusion rules, holding that the Clause did not provide for an "absolute" right for defendants. [ 13 ] The Court held that "The Compulsory Process Clause provides [the defendant] with an effective weapon, but it is a weapon that cannot be used irresponsibly". [ 14 ]

  9. Prisoners of Profit - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/prisoners-of-profit?...

    In 2001, an 18-year-old committed to a Texas boot camp operated by one of Slattery’s previous companies, Correctional Services Corp., came down with pneumonia and pleaded to see a doctor as he struggled to breathe.