Ad
related to: expertrating wikipedia na english
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia:Article assessment (historical), the previous version superseded by this version; Wikipedia:Assessing articles, an essay on the criteria and purpose of article assessments; Wikipedia:Metadata gadget, a script (and gadget) that finds articles' assessment information from the talk page and puts it in the article's header
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
A more formal review may be useful for some WikiProjects, such as the method used successfully at the Military History project.The method is summarized below: Add A-Class=current to the WikiProject banner at the top of the article's talk page, click on the "currently undergoing" link that appears then write up your nomination.
A perfect article in terms of technical style may be poorly written and have major gaps. A professor may write the definitive article on a subject, but their English is very poor and they see no need to add citations to their own work. The table below summarizes the criteria given at Wikipedia:WikiProject assessment. GA and FA are similar to A ...
Vital articles. The five nested vital article Levels are meant to give direction to the prioritization of improvements of English Wikipedia articles (e.g. which articles to bring to WP:GA and WP:FA status), to provide a measurement of quality of overall English Wikipedia (e.g. what proportion of the most important articles are at GA and FA status), and to serve as a centralized watchlist of ...
The use of modified letters (e.g. those with accents or other diacritics) in article titles is neither encouraged nor discouraged; when deciding between versions of a word that differ in the use or non-use of modified letters, follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language (including other encyclopedias and reference works).
More information for the nominator may be found at Wikipedia:Guide for nominating good articles. Why articles are nominated for Good article status Nominations are occasionally made by editors who happen upon an article that they believe is good quality, but the majority are made by editors who have spent extensive time working on the nominated ...
Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles—guidelines for reviewing an article for GA status; Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Quality Control/Reviewing Cheatsheet—useful suggestions for GA review; Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not—GA reviews should be concluded only in accordance with the GA criteria, not personal preferences
Ad
related to: expertrating wikipedia na english