enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. King v. Burwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_v._Burwell

    King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. 473 (2015), was a 6–3 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).

  3. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Burstyn,_Inc._v._Wilson

    Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952), also referred to as the Miracle Decision, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that largely marked the decline of motion picture censorship in the United States. [1]

  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipollone_v._Liggett_Group...

    Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case. In a split opinion, the Court held that the Surgeon General's warning did not preclude lawsuits by smokers against tobacco companies on the basis of several claims.

  5. Early divisions signal bitter internal conflicts as Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/news/early-divisions-signal-bitter...

    From a blockbuster Second Amendment decision to a more technical case about retaliatory arrests, sharp disagreements have emerged on the Supreme Court over the reasoning of recent rulings ...

  6. Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the...

    The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law.

  7. Disbarred SoCal attorney lied about having cancer, gambled ...

    www.aol.com/news/disbarred-socal-attorney-lied...

    A disbarred Manhattan Beach attorney lied about having terminal cancer, stole $117,000 in client funds to support a gambling habit, officials said.

  8. Chapman v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapman_v._California

    On an appeal to the California Supreme Court, Chapman and Teale argued a range of issues, which were generally flimsy legal arguments (including their right to a speedy trial, particular instructions issued to the jury, and whether various items should have been allowed as evidence), and the Court ruled against them on almost all of them.

  9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruzan_v._Director...

    In a 5–4 decision, the Court affirmed the earlier ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri and ruled in favor of the State of Missouri, finding it was acceptable to require "clear and convincing evidence" of a patient's wishes for removal of life support. A significant outcome of the case was the creation of advance health directives.