Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Lords Rodger and Brown dissenting on both points. R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15 is a United Kingdom discrimination case, concerning the Jewish Free School 's policy of denying entry to people whom they defined as belonging to a different religion. The United Kingdom Supreme Court held by a majority of five to four that the school ...
In 2013, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed suit against Harvard University in U.S. District Court in Boston, alleging that the university's undergraduate admission practices violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Asian Americans.
Loaded 0%. Three for-profit colleges appealed to block a settlement that would cancel more than $6 billion in student loans for 200,000 borrowers who applied for a debt discharge because they ...
In 2012, alumni of the New York Hasidic school system formed a group named Young Advocates for Fair Education (Yaffed) and voiced allegations that these schools, in particular boys schools, provide little to no secular education, thus initiating an ongoing campaign to bring about improvement in this matter through litigation and media exposure.
The staff for the Tennessee Public Charter School Commission held a public hearing to listen to 10 people speak in favor of the school and nine against regarding the appeal for the proposed K-8 ...
The switch to teacher-assessed grades meant that a further 15,000, who at first missed their firm offers, then met their grade requirements. This caused a capacity issue that meant that some oversubscribed universities, such as Durham University, had to offer incentives for students to defer their place to the following academic year ...
Without the financial help, college could be out of reach for some students. Total FAFSA submissions were down 3% – or by 432,000 – compared with the year before as of August 25, according to ...
Third Circuit affirmed. U.S. Const. amend. Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L., 594 U.S. 180 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the ability of schools to regulate student speech made off-campus, including speech made on social media. The case challenged past interpretations of Tinker v.