Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 9 February 2025. American review aggregator for film and television Rotten Tomatoes Screenshot Rotten Tomatoes's homepage as of April 1, 2021 Type of site Film and television review aggregator and user community Country of origin United States Owner Warner Bros. Discovery (25%) Comcast (75%) Founder(s ...
Rotten Tomatoes is considered generally reliable for its review aggregation and its news articles on film and TV. There is no consensus on whether its blog articles and critic opinion pages are generally reliable for facts. There is consensus that user reviews on Rotten Tomatoes are generally unreliable, as they are self-published sources ...
However, if Rotten Tomatoes has a sample of 10 reviews for an independent film, the sample is not large enough for the score to be statistically accurate. Top Critics in Rotten Tomatoes: The "Top Critics" section on Rotten Tomatoes is a smaller sample size and may be statistically inaccurate. The section's overall score may also differ ...
However, Rotten Tomatoes has now launched a new designation, in which films are branded “Verified Hot”, “Hot”, or “Stale”, depending on the feedback of the “Verified Audience”.
Cameron's conspicuous promotion of vote brigading prompted a backlash of review bombs on Rotten Tomatoes that later spread to IMDb, resulting in the film having one of the lowest aggregate user ratings on both websites. Cameron attributed the campaign to "haters and atheists" opposed to the film's religious message.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 47%, based on 17 reviews, with an average rating of 5.9/10. [27] Metacritic reports a 31 out of 100 score, based on five reviews, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews". [28] Several critics panned the film as biased.
Rotten Tomatoes logo. On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, a film has a rating of 100% if each professional review recorded by the website is assessed as positive rather than negative. The percentage is based on the film's reviews aggregated by the website and assessed as positive or negative, and when all aggregated reviews are ...
The practice is most commonly aimed at online media review aggregators, such as Steam, Metacritic, IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, or app stores. It may be motivated by unpopular changes to an established franchise, political or cultural controversies related to the product or service, or to the actions of its developers, vendors, or owners. [2]