Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
NH appealed to higher courts, ultimately leading to the Corte suprema di cassazione staying proceedings and referring two questions to the CJEU. The questions focused on the interpretation of Directive 2000/78 and concerned the material scope of this instrument, as well as the eligibility of a lawyers’ association to initiate legal action in ...
The ECJ is the senior court of the CJEU, and it consists of 27 judges, one from each member state, and 11 Advocates General. [2] The Advocates General have the same status as the other judges, but they are also responsible for submitting an independent opinion of the case to the judge panel before they make their decision.
Case C-108/98 - RI.SAN. v Comune di Ischia, Italia Lavoro SpA, formerly GEPI SpA and Ischia Ambiente SpA: the treaty principles relating to freedom of movement, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services were not engaged by the facts of the case, because the facts were "confined to a single Member State". RI.SAN.
The CJEU is the chief judicial authority of the EU and oversees the uniform application and interpretation of European Union law, in co-operation with the national judiciary of the member states. [4] The CJEU also resolves legal disputes between national governments and EU institutions, and may take action against EU institutions on behalf of ...
This list contains cases of the European Commission of Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) and United Nations Human Rights Committee (UN HRC) related to LGBTQ people.
The German law on Grundsicherung denied help to people who enter purely for social assistance or while searching for employment. The Social Code Book II ( Sozialgesetzbuch II ) said a person must be ‘capable of earning a living’ although the code as a whole was ‘to enable the beneficiaries to lead a life in keeping with human dignity’.
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College (C-256/01) [2] is a European Union law case concerning the right of men and women to equal pay for work of equal value under Article 141 of the Treaty of the European Community. [1]
H.N. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and others, [2012] IESC 58; [2013] 1 IR 142 (also referred to as Nawaz v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and others), is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court referred the following question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) for preliminary ruling in accordance with Article 267 Treaty on the ...