Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or more people examine the source code of a computer program, either after implementation or during the development process. The persons performing the checking, excluding the author, are called "reviewers".
Coding best practices or programming best practices are a set of informal, sometimes personal, rules (best practices) that many software developers, in computer programming follow to improve software quality. [1]
This is contributing to the Software Intelligence practice. This process is usually called "linting" since one of the first tools for static code analysis was called Lint. Some static code analysis tools can be used to help with automated code review. They do not compare favorably to manual reviews, however they can be done faster and more ...
A code review can be done as a special kind of inspection in which the team examines a sample of code and fixes any defects in it. In a code review, a defect is a block of code which does not properly implement its requirements, which does not function as the programmer intended, or which is not incorrect but could be improved (for example, it ...
All loops must have fixed bounds. This prevents runaway code. Avoid heap memory allocation. Restrict functions to a single printed page. Use a minimum of two runtime assertions per function. Restrict the scope of data to the smallest possible. Check the return value of all non-void functions, or cast to void to indicate the return value is useless.
Software peer review frequently involves reading source code. This type of peer review is primarily a defect detection activity. By definition, only the original author of a piece of code has read the source file before the code is submitted for review.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Rational Team Concert Code Review: IBM actively developed Proprietary: Rational Team Concert Linux, macOS, Windows pre- and post-commit Review Board: reviewboard.org actively developed MIT: CVS, Subversion, Git (partial), [1] Mercurial, Bazaar, Perforce, ClearCase, Plastic SCM Python: pre- and post-commit Rietveld: Guido van Rossum: actively ...