Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court ruled that the use of thermal imaging devices to monitor heat radiation in or around a person's home, even if conducted from a public vantage point, is unconstitutional without a search warrant. [1]
Case name Citation Date decided Kansas v. Colorado: 533 U.S. 1: 2001: Kyllo v. United States: 533 U.S. 27: 2001: Tuan Anh Nguyen v. INS: 533 U.S. 53: 2001: Good News ...
In Kyllo v.United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), the Court held that the use of a thermal imaging device from a public vantage point to monitor the radiation of heat from a person's home to identify home drug cultivation was deemed unconstitutional, because in addition to exposing illegal activity without a warrant, the privacy of the home was compromised.
Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL
The 2007 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 1, 2007, and concluded September 30, 2008. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.
(Reuters) -The Republican-led states of Idaho, Missouri and Kansas can proceed with a lawsuit seeking to restrict the availability of the abortion pill mifepristone in the United States, a federal ...
Paula Abdul and Nigel Lythgoe have reached a settlement in their lawsuit. According to court documents obtained by PEOPLE, the pair settled the case, in which Abdul accused the producer of sexual ...
The paragraph beginning, "For Kyllo, the result was tremendous . . ." was added to WP here on August 12, 2006; the one beginning "Kyllo was charged with growing marijuana in violation of federal law." was added here also on August 12. The key words used to identify the correlations are "tremendous" and "reflected", respectively.