Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Kansas v. Colorado is a longstanding litigation before the Supreme Court of the United States between US states: Kansas and Colorado regarding the payment for the use of the Arkansas River. The Court has rendered numerous opinions on the case: Kansas v. Colorado, 185 U.S. 125 (1902) Kansas v. Colorado, 206 U.S. 46 (1907) Colorado v. Kansas, 320 ...
Allocation of the water from the Republican River is governed through an agreement called the Republican River Compact, involving the states of Nebraska, Kansas and Colorado, as modified by the settlement [19] of a United States Supreme Court case (Kansas vs. Nebraska and Colorado) involving a water-use dispute under the Compact. [20]
Handly's Lessee v. Anthony, 18 U.S. (5 Wheat.) 374 (1820), was a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the proper boundary between the states of Indiana and Kentucky was the low-water mark on the western and northwestern bank of the Ohio River.
Negotiate the amount of the 1099 income before you finalize the settlement: Before you sign the settlement agreement, define whether or not the defendant will issue a Form 1099 or not. If they ...
(The Center Square) – Colorado is set to get $81 million if a settlement between a coalition of states, the Sackler family and Purdue Pharma is approved. Colorado’s portion would be part of a ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Kansas v. Colorado: Supreme Court of the United States: 1902, 1907, 1943, 1995, 2001, 2004, 2009 Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation: Climate: destruction of a community by climate change: United States federal courts: 2009 Kleppe v. New Mexico: Wildlife: horses and burros: Supreme Court of the United States: 1976 Koontz v. St. Johns River Water ...
A Kansas community college that was accused of trying to reduce the number of Black student-athletes has agreed to a settlement, the Justice Department announced Monday. The department said in a ...