Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Furthermore, the last time WP:NOTABILITY of the subject was questioned, it was unanimously agreed that it met notability. Per WP:NTEMP, the relevant quote is "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage."
While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, an article may be proposed for deletion months or even years after its ...
WP:What Wikipedia is not is invoked in the meta-guideline portion of WP:Notability. Beside the prima facie requirement of no outright rejection by this policy, the degree to which wp:not requirement has been met is incorporated in the Special Notability Guidelines as well as wiki-notability decision in general
Even if you fix the issue(s) described in a maintenance template, the tag will remain in the article until you or someone else manually removes it. The mechanics of removal are usually as simple as clicking "Edit" at the top of the page or in the section involved (if you're not already in edit mode), removing the code that produces the display ...
The topic of the article must meet WP:Notability criteria; The Wikipedia article must contain at least enough content to meet the criteria of being a WP:STUB; The Wikipedia article must cite sources for whatever information it presents; Typically the Wikipedia community only evaluates whether an article meets notability criteria.
Though the concept of a "book" is widely defined, this guideline does not provide specific notability criteria for the following types of publications: comic books; graphic novels (although it does apply to manga); magazines; reference works such as dictionaries, thesauruses, encyclopedias, atlases and almanacs; music-specific publications such as instruction and notation books and librettos ...
In the dictionary, notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." Wikipedia bases its decision about whether web content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the web content has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the web content, its authors, or its owners.
Not even a promise that, soon, the subject will meet the notability guidelines. Nothing. None of these things address the problem. The problem is not with the article itself: the problem is what the article is about. Editors who protest against deletion nominations of articles they create are often closely related to the subject.