Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Cramer's rule, implemented in a naive way, is computationally inefficient for systems of more than two or three equations. [7] In the case of n equations in n unknowns, it requires computation of n + 1 determinants, while Gaussian elimination produces the result with the same computational complexity as the computation of a single determinant.
The number of distinct terms (including those with a zero coefficient) in an n-th degree equation in two variables is (n + 1)(n + 2) / 2.This is because the n-th degree terms are ,, …,, numbering n + 1 in total; the (n − 1) degree terms are ,, …,, numbering n in total; and so on through the first degree terms and , numbering 2 in total, and the single zero degree term (the constant).
[2] [3] Cramer and Leonhard Euler corresponded on the paradox in letters of 1744 and 1745 and Euler explained the problem to Cramer. [4] It has become known as Cramer's paradox after featuring in his 1750 book Introduction à l'analyse des lignes courbes algébriques , although Cramer quoted Maclaurin as the source of the statement. [ 5 ]
The solution set for the equations x − y = −1 and 3x + y = 9 is the single point (2, 3). A solution of a linear system is an assignment of values to the variables ,, …, such that each of the equations is satisfied. The set of all possible solutions is called the solution set. [5]
The result is named in honor of Harald Cramér and Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao, [1] [2] [3] but has also been derived independently by Maurice Fréchet, [4] Georges Darmois, [5] and by Alexander Aitken and Harold Silverstone. [6] [7] It is also known as Fréchet-Cramér–Rao or Fréchet-Darmois-Cramér-Rao lower bound.
In statistics, Cramér's V (sometimes referred to as Cramér's phi and denoted as φ c) is a measure of association between two nominal variables, giving a value between 0 and +1 (inclusive). It is based on Pearson's chi-squared statistic and was published by Harald Cramér in 1946. [1]
Since all the inequalities are in the same form (all less-than or all greater-than), we can examine the coefficient signs for each variable. Eliminating x would yield 2*2 = 4 inequalities on the remaining variables, and so would eliminating y. Eliminating z would yield only 3*1 = 3 inequalities so we use that instead.
Cramér’s decomposition theorem, a statement about the sum of normal distributed random variable; Cramér's theorem (large deviations), a fundamental result in the theory of large deviations; Cramer's theorem (algebraic curves), a result regarding the necessary number of points to determine a curve