enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruxley_Electronics_and...

    Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995] UKHL 8 is an English contract law case, concerning the choice between an award of damages for the cost of curing a defect in a building contract or (when that is unreasonable) for awarding damages for loss of "amenity".

  3. R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Ron_Engineering_and...

    R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd, [1] of 1981 is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the law of tendering for contracts. The case concerned the issue of whether the acceptance of a call for tenders for a construction job could constitute a binding contract. The Court held that indeed in many cases the submission of ...

  4. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_&_Youngs,_Inc._v._Kent

    Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent, 230 N.Y. 239 (1921) is an American contract law case of the New York Court of Appeals with a majority opinion by Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo.The case addresses several contract principles including applying the doctrine of substantial performance in preventing forfeiture and determining the appropriate remedy following a partial or defective performance.

  5. G. L. Christian and Associates v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._L._Christian_and...

    The Army Corps of Engineers signed a contract with G.L. Christian and Associates to build 2,000 housing units for soldiers at Fort Polk, Louisiana, under the "Capehart Act". Fort Polk was deactivated by the Department of the Army in 1958, and the $32.9 million construction contract was terminated by the Corps of Engineers on February 5, 1958 ...

  6. Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_Contractors_Ltd_v...

    The arbitrator who first dealt with Davis Contractors' claim held that "the footing of the contract was removed" and therefore the original contract had come to an end. [1] On referral to the House of Lords, the Lords held that although the performance of the contract had become more onerous, it was not frustrated.

  7. Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrotham_Park_Estate_Co_Ltd...

    Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798 (/ ˈ r uː t ə m /) is an English land law and English contract law case, concerning the measure and availability of damages for breach of negative covenant in circumstances where the court has confirmed that a covenant is legally enforceable and refused, as unconscionable, to issue an order for specific performance or an ...

  8. Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investors_Compensation...

    Construction, interpretation, context Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd. v West Bromwich Building Society [1997] UKHL 28 is a frequently-cited English contract law case which laid down that a contextual approach must be taken to the interpretation of contracts .

  9. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codelfa_Construction_Pty...

    Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, [1] ("Codelfa") is a widely cited Australian contract law case, [2] which serves as authority for the modern approach to contractual construction. [3] The case greatly influenced the development of the Eastern Suburbs railway line. In terms of contract law, the case ...