enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Ron_Engineering_and...

    R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd, [1] of 1981 is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the law of tendering for contracts. The case concerned the issue of whether the acceptance of a call for tenders for a construction job could constitute a binding contract. The Court held that indeed in many cases the submission of ...

  3. Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartbrook_Ltd_v_Persimmon...

    Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts.It creates a so-called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context.

  4. Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruxley_Electronics_and...

    Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995] UKHL 8 is an English contract law case, concerning the choice between an award of damages for the cost of curing a defect in a building contract or (when that is unreasonable) for awarding damages for loss of "amenity".

  5. G. L. Christian and Associates v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._L._Christian_and...

    The Army Corps of Engineers signed a contract with G.L. Christian and Associates to build 2,000 housing units for soldiers at Fort Polk, Louisiana, under the "Capehart Act". Fort Polk was deactivated by the Department of the Army in 1958, and the $32.9 million construction contract was terminated by the Corps of Engineers on February 5, 1958 ...

  6. Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investors_Compensation...

    Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd. v West Bromwich Building Society [1997] UKHL 28 is a frequently-cited English contract law case which laid down that a contextual approach must be taken to the interpretation of contracts. Lord Hoffmann set out five principles, so that contract should be construed according to:

  7. Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v_Roffey_Bros...

    Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1989] EWCA Civ 5 is a leading English contract law case. It decided that in varying a contract, a promise to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation will constitute good consideration so long as a benefit is conferred upon the 'promiseor'.

  8. Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalgamated_Investment_and...

    The contract was signed on 25 September 1973. Then the Secretary of State wrote to John Walker that it had been listed, taking effect on that day. The property value dropped to £200,000 (because a listed property which one cannot easily develop is often worth less money).

  9. Thomas Witter Ltd v TBP Industries - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Witter_Ltd_v_TBP...

    Thomas Witter Ltd v TBP Industries [1996] 2 All ER 573 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Doubt has been cast in its decision as to availability of rescission by Floods of Queensferry Ltd v Shand Construction Ltd [1] and Government of Zanzibar v British Aerospace (Lancaster House) Ltd. [2]