Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Set-builder notation can be used to describe a set that is defined by a predicate, that is, a logical formula that evaluates to true for an element of the set, and false otherwise. [2] In this form, set-builder notation has three parts: a variable, a colon or vertical bar separator, and a predicate. Thus there is a variable on the left of the ...
Semantic definitions and definitions using set-builder notation are examples. An extensional definition describes a set by listing all its elements. [19] Such definitions are also called enumerative. An ostensive definition is one that describes a set by giving examples of elements; a roster involving an ellipsis would be an example.
The reason is as follows: The intersection of the collection is defined as the set (see set-builder notation) = {:,}. If M {\displaystyle M} is empty, there are no sets A {\displaystyle A} in M , {\displaystyle M,} so the question becomes "which x {\displaystyle x} 's satisfy the stated condition?"
In mathematics, the symmetric difference of two sets, also known as the disjunctive union and set sum, is the set of elements which are in either of the sets, but not in their intersection. For example, the symmetric difference of the sets { 1 , 2 , 3 } {\displaystyle \{1,2,3\}} and { 3 , 4 } {\displaystyle \{3,4\}} is { 1 , 2 , 4 ...
In set-builder notation, it is used as a separator meaning "such that"; see { | }. 3. Restriction of a function : if f is a function , and S is a subset of its domain , then f | S {\displaystyle f|_{S}} is the function with S as a domain that equals f on S .
This notation is called set-builder notation (or "set comprehension", particularly in the context of Functional programming). Some variants of set builder notation are: {x ∈ A | P(x)} denotes the set of all x that are already members of A such that the condition P holds for x.
Expressions definable in set-builder notation make sense in both ZFC and NFU: it may be that both theories prove that a given definition succeeds, or that neither do (the expression {} fails to refer to anything in any set theory with classical logic; in class theories like NBG this notation does refer to a class, but it is defined differently ...
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".