enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pretext - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretext

    A pretext (adj.: pretextual) is an excuse to do something or say something that is not accurate. Pretexts may be based on a half-truth or developed in the context of a misleading fabrication. Pretexts may be based on a half-truth or developed in the context of a misleading fabrication.

  3. Smith v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._California

    Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147 (1959), was a U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the freedom of the press.The decision deemed unconstitutional a city ordinance that made one in possession of obscene books criminally liable because it did not require proof that one had knowledge of the book's content, and thus violated the freedom of the press guaranteed in the First Amendment. [1]

  4. Regents of University of California v. Superior Court of Los ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_University_of...

    Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 4 Cal. 5th 607, 413 P.3d 656 (2018), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that universities owe a duty to protect students from foreseeable violence during curricular activities.

  5. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Motor_Transport...

    In two cases interpreting these laws (Eastern Railroad Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight Inc. [3] and United Mine Workers v. Pennington [4]), the Supreme Court had created the Noerr–Pennington doctrine. Because of the rights in the First Amendment, the Court had ruled in these cases that attempts to influence the passage or enforcement of ...

  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  7. California Supreme Court upholds Uber workers' right to sue

    www.aol.com/news/california-supreme-court...

    The decision follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June 2022 in another California case, Viking River Cruises Inc. vs. Moriana, in which the high court concluded the opposite, that PAGA violated ...

  8. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the ...

  9. Menendez brothers clemency decision delayed until new DA can ...

    www.aol.com/news/menendez-brothers-clemency...

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom says a clemency decision for convicted murderers Erik and Lyle Menendez is on hold until Los Angeles' newly-elected district attorney can review the case.