enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.

  3. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.

  4. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  5. United States v. Patane - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Patane

    In a decision without a majority opinion, three justices wrote that the Miranda warnings were merely intended to prevent violations of the Constitution, and that because Patane's un-Mirandized testimony was not admitted at trial, the Constitution (specifically the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination) had not been violated.

  6. Supreme Court set to rule on whether Miranda warnings are a ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-set-rule-whether...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_Immigration_Reform...

    The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRAIRA or IIRIRA), [2] [3] was a law enacted as division C of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, made major changes to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). IIRAIRA's changes became effective on April 1, 1997.

  8. White House weighs immigration relief for spouses of US ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/white-house-weighs-immigration...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House is weighing ways to provide temporary legal status and work permits to immigrants in the U.S. illegally who are married to American citizens, three sources ...

  9. Ronald Reagan was right — immigration is our superpower and ...

    www.aol.com/news/ronald-reagan-immigration...

    Anne Piehl and her co-authors showed that far from being dangerous and criminal, immigrants are more law-abiding than native-born Americans and have been since the 1800s.