Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[1] [2] With the stated purpose to promote art and culture, copyright law assigns a set of exclusive rights to authors: to make and sell copies of their works, to create derivative works, and to perform or display their works publicly. These exclusive rights are subject to a time and generally expire 70 years after the author's death or 95 ...
The court ruled that exact or "slavish" reproductions of two-dimensional works such as paintings and photographs that were already in the public domain could not be considered original enough for protection under U.S. law, "a photograph which is no more than a copy of a work of another as exact as science and technology permits lacks ...
the right to create derivative works of the original work, the right to distribute copies and phonorecords of the work to the public by sale, lease, or rental, the right to perform the work publicly (if the work is a literary, musical, dramatic, choreographic, pantomime, motion picture, or other audiovisual work), and
the right to object to derogatory treatment of work (ss. 80–83); the right to object to false attribution of work (s. 84); the right to privacy of certain photographs and films (s. 85). The moral rights of an author cannot be transferred to another person (s.
The preemption is complete insofar as works fall within the federal copyright statute. A work that falls generally within the subject matter of copyright (such as a writing) must either qualify to be protected under federal law, or it cannot be protected at all. State law cannot provide protection for a work that federal law does not protect. [22]
The concept of user rights has been recognised by courts, including the Canadian Supreme Court, [2] which classed "fair dealing" as such a user right. These kinds of disagreements in philosophy are quite common in the philosophy of copyright , where debates about jurisprudential reasoning tend to act as proxies for more substantial ...
All published derivative works must use exactly the same license as the original: if you use the work, you're forced to use the same license for your own original work as well. If your work is using a different license, you can't use the copyleft license, even if your work is also using a (different) copyleft licence.
In both countries, the courts found that copyright is a limited right under statutes and subject to the conditions and terms the legislature sees fit to impose. The decision in the UK did not, however, directly rule on whether copyright was a common-law right. In the United States, common law copyright also refers to state-level copyrights.