Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Even before Andrews filed his lawsuit, 2000 Mules had been widely debunked over the “categorically false” claims and conspiracy theories it peddled in service of Donald Trump’s repeated and ...
D’Souza said he “operated in good faith,” but would have edited the conspiracy film differently if he knew the true nature of cell phone data.
The creator of a widely debunked movie that became a central pillar in the false narrative that the 2020 election was stolen has admitted that some of the film’s claims are flawed.
According to the Poynter Institute, there are four categories of false fact-checking websites: Sites that are satirical in nature; Sites that attempt to subvert serious fact-checking sites; Sites that re-appropriate the term "fact-check" for partisan political causes; Sites with more violent intentions, such as genocide denial. [80]
2000 Mules not only pushes "false" misinformation, but it's lost enough lawsuits, and been recalled in enough instances, and uniformly dismissed by enough academics publicly in the forensic sense, that it also holds the distinction of a "failed" documentary in the information/truth sense.
Reference [4] “fact check” is actually an opinion article and in no way represents legitimate fact checking. The claims made by the 2000 Mules movie are substantiated as demonstrated by prosecutions and convictions being brought as a result of the evidence 2000 Mules provided.
WASHINGTON — Conservative gadfly Dinesh D’Souza’s film and book “2000 Mules,” which pushes false conspiracies about voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, has been removed from ...
Jump to content. Main menu