Ads
related to: virginia violation of custody order california superior court forms downloadA Must Have in your Arsenal - cmscritic
- Edit PDF Documents Online
Upload & Edit any PDF File Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Write Text in PDF Online
Upload & Write on PDF Forms Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- pdfFiller Account Log In
Easily Sign Up or Login to Your
pdfFiller Account. Try Now!
- Make PDF Forms Fillable
Upload & Fill in PDF Forms Online.
No Installation Needed. Try Now!
- Edit PDF Documents Online
uslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Roe v. Roe was a landmark child custody case in Virginia that denied the father custody due to his sexual orientation. [1] The 1985 case was brought to the Virginia Supreme Court and the father's custody was removed due to “continuous exposure of his nine-year-old daughter to his immoral and illicit homosexual relationship rendered him an unfit and improper custodian.”
A court that has made a child-custody determination consistent with UCCJEA has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over the determination until either (1) that court determines that neither the child, the child's parents, nor any person acting as a parent has a significant connection with the State that made the original order and that ...
In the decades leading up to the 1970s child custody battles were rare, and in most cases the mother of minor children would receive custody. [5] Since the 1970s, as custody laws have been made gender-neutral, contested custody cases have increased as have cases in which the children are placed in the primary custody of the father.
Bottoms v. Bottoms, 457 S.E.2d 102 (Va. 1995), was a landmark child custody case in Virginia that awarded custody of the child to the grandmother instead of the mother, primarily because the mother was a lesbian. [1] In April 1993, Kay Bottoms sued her daughter, Sharon Bottoms, for custody of Sharon Bottoms' son, Tyler Doustou.
The superior court granted Gerald's motion, rejected challenges by Victoria (represented by a guardian ad litem) and Michael to the law's constitutionality, and denied visitation on the grounds that it would "violat[e] the intention of the Legislature by impugning the integrity of the family unit". [1]
Depending on the laws of the state or country in which an abduction occurs, this may or may not constitute a criminal offense. For example, removing a child from the UK for 28 days without the other parent's permission (or a person with parental responsibility) is a criminal offense. [2]