Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The "second-order cone" in SOCP arises from the constraints, which are equivalent to requiring the affine function (+, +) to lie in the second-order cone in +. [ 1 ] SOCPs can be solved by interior point methods [ 2 ] and in general, can be solved more efficiently than semidefinite programming (SDP) problems. [ 3 ]
Examples of include the positive orthant + = {:}, positive semidefinite matrices +, and the second-order cone {(,): ‖ ‖}. Often f {\displaystyle f\ } is a linear function, in which case the conic optimization problem reduces to a linear program , a semidefinite program , and a second order cone program , respectively.
Such a constraint set is called a polyhedron or a polytope if it is bounded. Second-order cone programming (SOCP) is a convex program, and includes certain types of quadratic programs. Semidefinite programming (SDP) is a subfield of convex optimization where the underlying variables are semidefinite matrices. It is a generalization of linear ...
There are two main relaxations of QCQP: using semidefinite programming (SDP), and using the reformulation-linearization technique (RLT). For some classes of QCQP problems (precisely, QCQPs with zero diagonal elements in the data matrices), second-order cone programming (SOCP) and linear programming (LP) relaxations providing the same objective value as the SDP relaxation are available.
In LP, the objective and constraint functions are all linear. Quadratic programming are the next-simplest. In QP, the constraints are all linear, but the objective may be a convex quadratic function. Second order cone programming are more general. Semidefinite programming are more general. Conic optimization are even more general - see figure ...
Alternatively, if the constraints are all equality constraints and are all linear, they can be solved for some of the variables in terms of the others, and the former can be substituted out of the objective function, leaving an unconstrained problem in a smaller number of variables.
The coefficients given in the table above correspond to the latter definition. The theory of Lagrange polynomials provides explicit formulas for the finite difference coefficients. [4] For the first six derivatives we have the following:
Equivalently, the second-order conditions that are sufficient for a local minimum or maximum can be expressed in terms of the sequence of principal (upper-leftmost) minors (determinants of sub-matrices) of the Hessian; these conditions are a special case of those given in the next section for bordered Hessians for constrained optimization—the ...