Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Synonym for assertion, the axiom that (A ∧ (A → B)) → B. [243] [244] punctuation In logic, refers to parentheses and brackets. [245] pure first-order logic The system of first-order logic that contains no function symbols or identity, only predicate symbols. [246] pure predicate logic See pure first-order logic. Putnam's model-theoretic ...
The conclusion then is a general law that this pattern always obtains. [81] ... The term "mathematical logic" is sometimes used as a synonym of "formal logic". But in ...
Naturalistic fallacy – inferring evaluative conclusions from purely factual premises [105] [106] in violation of fact-value distinction. Naturalistic fallacy (sometimes confused with appeal to nature) is the inverse of moralistic fallacy. Is–ought fallacy [107] – deduce a conclusion about what ought to be, on the basis of what is.
Jumping to conclusions (officially the jumping conclusion bias, often abbreviated as JTC, and also referred to as the inference-observation confusion [1]) is a psychological term referring to a communication obstacle where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having all the facts; to reach unwarranted conclusions".
Conclusion (book), the concluding section of a book; Conclusion of Utrecht, a synod of the Christian Reformed Church; Statistical conclusion validity, a statistical test; Sudler's Conclusion, a historic home in Puerto Rico, Somerset County, Maryland
A variety of basic concepts is used in the study and analysis of logical reasoning. Logical reasoning happens by inferring a conclusion from a set of premises. [3] Premises and conclusions are normally seen as propositions. A proposition is a statement that makes a claim about what is the case.
Today's NYT Connections puzzle for Thursday, February 13, 2025The New York Times
A valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion is entailed by the premises, because the conclusion is the consequence of the premises. The philosophical analysis of logical consequence involves the questions: In what sense does a conclusion follow from its premises? and What does it mean for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises ...