enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Correspondent inference theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondent_inference_theory

    Correspondent inference theory is a psychological theory proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith E. Davis (1965) that "systematically accounts for a perceiver's inferences about what an actor was trying to achieve by a particular action". [1] The purpose of this theory is to explain why people make internal or external attributions.

  3. Edward E. Jones - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_E._Jones

    A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Jones as the 39th most cited psychologist of the 20th century. [1] Along with Keith E. Davis, he is known for developing correspondent inference theory within the field of psychological attribution.

  4. Existential graph - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_graph

    Rules of inference: Insertion - Any subgraph may be inserted into an odd numbered depth. The surrounding white page is depth 1. Depth 2 are the black letters and lines that encircle elements. Depth 3 is entering the next white area in an enclosed element. Erasure - Any subgraph in an even numbered depth may be erased. Rules of equivalence:

  5. Correspondence theory of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondence_theory_of_truth

    Correspondence theory is a traditional model which goes back at least to some of the ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. [2] [3] This class of theories holds that the truth or the falsity of a representation is determined solely by how it relates to a reality; that is, by whether it accurately describes that reality.

  6. Fundamental attribution error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error

    Correspondence inferences were invited to a greater degree by interpretative action verbs (such as "to help") than state action or state verbs, thus suggesting that the two are produced under different circumstances. Correspondence inferences and causal attributions also differ in automaticity.

  7. Sign (semiotics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)

    Peirce's theory of the sign therefore offered a powerful analysis of the signification system, its codes, and its processes of inference and learning—because the focus was often on natural or cultural context rather than linguistics, which only analyses usage in slow time whereas human semiotic interaction in the real world often has a ...

  8. Jungian archetypes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_archetypes

    Jungian archetypes are a concept from psychology that refers to a universal, inherited idea, pattern of thought, or image that is present in the collective unconscious of all human beings. The psychic counterpart of instinct , archetypes are thought to be the basis of many of the common themes and symbols that appear in stories, myths, and ...

  9. Triangle of reference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference

    The triangle of reference (also known as the triangle of meaning [1] and the semiotic triangle) is a model of how linguistic symbols relate to the objects they represent. The triangle was published in The Meaning of Meaning (1923) by Charles Kay Ogden and I. A. Richards. [2]