enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Minnesota Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Supreme_Court

    The court system was rearranged when Minnesota became a state in 1858. Appeals from Minnesota District Courts went directly to the Minnesota Supreme Court until the Minnesota Court of Appeals, an intermediate appellate court, was created in 1983 to handle most of those cases.

  3. Near v. Minnesota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota

    Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court under which prior restraint on publication was found to violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment. This principle was applied to free speech generally in subsequent jurisprudence. [1]

  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago,_Milwaukee_&_St...

    Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that procedural due process limits state regulatory power over railroad rates. [1] A regulatory agency in Minnesota had set railroad rates that the Minnesota Supreme Court had refused to

  5. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.A.V._v._City_of_St._Paul

    R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992), is a case of the United States Supreme Court that unanimously struck down St. Paul's Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance and reversed the conviction of a teenager, referred to in court documents only as R.A.V., for burning a cross on the lawn of an African-American family since the ordinance was held to violate the First Amendment's protection of ...

  6. Minnesota Supreme Court dismisses ‘insurrection clause ...

    www.aol.com/news/minnesota-supreme-court...

    Minnesota Supreme Court declined to become the first in history to use Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to prevent someone from running for the presidency. The court dodged the central question of ...

  7. Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Voters_Alliance...

    Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court concerning the constitutionality of governmental speech restrictions in a polling place venue. The case challenged a century-old Minnesota law that prevents

  8. Minnesota Supreme Court considers whether it should intervene ...

    www.aol.com/minnesota-supreme-court-considers...

    The Minnesota Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday on how deeply it should intervene in a power struggle between Democrats and Republicans over who should control the state House of Representatives.

  9. Minnesota Supreme Court upholds law restoring right to vote ...

    www.aol.com/news/minnesota-supreme-court-upholds...

    The Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a 2023 state law that restores voting rights for felons once they have completed their prison sentences. The new law was popular with Democrats in ...