enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument–deduction–proof distinctions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument–deduction...

    Every argument's conclusion is a premise of other arguments. The word constituent may be used for either a premise or conclusion. In the context of this article and in most classical contexts, all candidates for consideration as argument constituents fall under the category of truth-bearer: propositions, statements, sentences, judgments, etc.

  3. Epistemology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology

    Epistemology is the philosophical study of knowledge and related concepts, such as justification. Also called theory of knowledge, [a] it examines the nature and types of knowledge. It further investigates the sources of knowledge, like perception, inference, and testimony, to understand how knowledge is created.

  4. Criteria of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criteria_of_truth

    For example, a doctor may prescribe a patient medication for an illness, but it could later turn out that a placebo is equally effective. Thus, untrue concepts could appear to be working contrary to the purpose of the pragmatic test. However, it has validity as a test, particularly in the form William Ernest Hocking called "negative pragmatism ...

  5. Premise - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

    A premise or premiss [a] is a proposition—a true or false declarative statement—used in an argument to prove the truth of another proposition called the conclusion. [1] Arguments consist of a set of premises and a conclusion. An argument is meaningful for its conclusion only when all of its premises are true. If one or more premises are ...

  6. Argument map - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map

    Identify which statements are premises, sub-conclusions, and the main conclusion. Provide missing, implied conclusions and implied premises. (This is optional depending on the purpose of the argument map.) Put the statements into boxes and draw a line between any boxes that are linked. Indicate support from premise(s) to (sub)conclusion with ...

  7. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    In the logical argumentation approach, knowledge is seen as form of belief commitment firmly fixed by an argumentation procedure that tests the evidence on both sides, and uses standards of proof to determine whether a proposition qualifies as knowledge. In this evidence-based approach, knowledge must be seen as defeasible.

  8. Glossary of logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_logic

    premise A statement in an argument that provides support or evidence for the conclusion. prenex normal form A form of logical expression where all quantifiers are moved to the front, standardizing the structure of first-order logical statements. primitive recursion

  9. Fact–value distinction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact–value_distinction

    Statements of value (normative or prescriptive statements), which encompass ethics and aesthetics, and are studied via axiology. This barrier between fact and value, as construed in epistemology, implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter.