Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Has a plotting pane. Juno team merged with VS Code extension team (see below); Juno now in maintenance mode. Emacs / spacemacs: portions in GPL v2, LGPL, BSD and public domain: Yes Yes Yes FreeBSD: Yes Yes ESS extension support for emacs. vi support also available, e.g. in spacemacs (useful for pair programming). Visual Studio Code (using the ...
Any programming language (proven for C, C++, Java, C#, PHP, COBOL) gSOAP: C / C++ WSDL specifications C / C++ code that can be used to communicate with WebServices. XML with the definitions obtained. Microsoft Visual Studio LightSwitch: C# / VB.NET Active Tier Database schema: Complete Silverlight application (Desktop or Web) Pro*C: Inline SQL ...
Provides warnings if tagged parameters do not match code, parsed parameters included in XML output and Doxygen-style tagfile (-D flag in 8.7). Partial C preprocessor support with -p flag. Support for #if/#ifdef control over documentation inclusion using the -D and -U command-line flags.
Code::Blocks is a free, open-source, cross-platform IDE that supports multiple compilers including GCC, Clang and Visual C++. It is developed in C++ using wxWidgets as the GUI toolkit. Using a plugin architecture, its capabilities and features are defined by the provided plugins. Currently, Code::Blocks is oriented towards C, C++, and Fortran.
C, Vim script: No cost: Vim Visual Studio Code: Microsoft: 2015 1.96.4 [44] 2025-01-17 JavaScript, TypeScript: No cost: Source code: MIT [45] Binaries built by Microsoft: Proprietary [46] [47] XEmacs: Lucid Inc. 1991 21.4.22 [48] 2009-01-30 C, Emacs Lisp No cost: GPL-2.0-or-later: XNEdit: Olaf Wintermann 2018 1.5.2 2023-10-05 C No cost: GPL-2.0 ...
The Computer Language Benchmarks Game site warns against over-generalizing from benchmark data, but contains a large number of micro-benchmarks of reader-contributed code snippets, with an interface that generates various charts and tables comparing specific programming languages and types of tests.
Edison Design Group: provides production-quality front end compilers for C, C++, and Java (a number of the compilers listed on this page use front end source code from Edison Design Group [111]). Additionally, Edison Design Group makes their proprietary software available for research uses.
Comparisons in November 2016 between GCC 4.8.2 versus clang 3.4, on a large harness of test files shows that GCC outperforms clang by approximately 17% on well-optimized source code. Test results are code-specific, and unoptimized C source code can reverse such differences. The two compilers thus seem broadly comparable. [31] [unreliable source]