enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Edwards v. Vannoy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Vannoy

    Edwards v. Vannoy, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Court's prior decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which had ruled that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Here’s who’s running in the Democratic primary for Texas ...

    www.aol.com/running-democratic-primary-texas...

    (Please list previous offices sought, with years): I was elected to the 5th District Court of Appeals, in November of 2020 and have served as Justice, Place 3 since January 1, 2021, I was elected ...

  4. Meet the candidates for Place 6 on Texas Supreme Court on ...

    www.aol.com/news/meet-candidates-place-6-texas...

    The Texas Supreme Court is the state’s highest court, or court of last resort, for civil matters in the state. It is made up of nine justices who serve in six-year terms, and three of the court ...

  5. Ramos v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramos_v._Louisiana

    While federal law mandated that a federal jury trial require a unanimous vote to convict a suspect on a criminal charge, the 1972 Supreme Court case Apodaca v. Oregon ruled that states did not have to follow this. All but two states adopted unanimous jury votes to convict. Oregon allowed a jury vote of 10–2 or more for conviction (which ...

  6. Apodaca v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apodaca_v._Oregon

    In 2018, Louisiana voters passed a constitutional amendment that ended their practice of non-unanimous juries. [11] [12] When Apodaca was overruled by Ramos v. Louisiana in April 2020, Oregon was the only state that still allowed non-unanimous jury verdicts for felonies (although first-degree murder convictions require a unanimous jury verdict).

  7. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence . Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  8. Johnson v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._Louisiana

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Louisiana law that allowed less-than unanimous jury verdicts (9 to 12 jurors) to convict persons charged with a felony, does not violate the Due Process clause. This case was argued on a similar basis as Apodaca v. Oregon. [1

  9. Texas Supreme Court justice seeking reelection under fire for ...

    www.aol.com/texas-supreme-court-justice-seeking...

    Justice John Devine, 65, the fourth-most senior justice, having joined the high court in 2012 after ousting an incumbent, is taking heat from his GOP primary challenger, Judge Brian Walker of the ...