Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The sharing of research outputs is covered by three standards of the TOPs guidelines: on Data transparency (2), Analytic/code methods transparency (3) and Research materials transparency (4). All the relevant data, code and research materials are to be stored on a "trusted repository" and all analysis being already reproduced independently ...
Yes VIVO Consortium received $12.2M NIH ARRA U24 award in 2009 to fully develop software and create national system of federated research expertise directories/research networking systems; All other semantic web-compliant software platforms can be integrated into the consortium (example: Harvard Profiles).
Research Software Design Prior to 1991 1997 7.0.17 for DOS/Windows and 8.0.12 for Mac OS Free Yes Unknown Free as of January 2004 Notes ...
Those who publish research in this way are often concerned with making research more transparent, more collaborative, more wide-reaching, and more efficient. Open research aims to make both research methods and the resulting data freely available , often via the internet, in order to support reproducibility and, potentially, massively ...
Recent research has shown that bounded rationality of individuals may influence the topology of the social networks that evolve among them. In particular, Kasthurirathna and Piraveenan [ 45 ] have shown that in socio-ecological systems , the drive towards improved rationality on average might be an evolutionary reason for the emergence of scale ...
Site members may follow a research interest, in addition to following other individual members. [10] It has a blogging feature for users to write short reviews on peer-reviewed articles. [10] ResearchGate indexes self-published information on user profiles to suggest members to connect with others who have similar interests. [3]
Another task might be to find the best alternative or to determine the relative total priority of each alternative (for instance, if alternatives represent projects competing for funds) when all the criteria are considered simultaneously. Solving such problems is the focus of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).
Indeed, authors may recommend "further research" when, given the existing evidence, further research would be extremely unlikely to be approved by an ethics committee. [ 3 ] Studies finding that a treatment has no noticeable effects are sometimes greeted with statements that "more research is needed" by those convinced that the treatment is ...