Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In November 2003, UTF-8 was restricted by RFC 3629 to match the constraints of the UTF-16 character encoding: explicitly prohibiting code points corresponding to the high and low surrogate characters removed more than 3% of the three-byte sequences, and ending at U+10FFFF removed more than 48% of the four-byte sequences and all five- and six ...
[3] This is due to the large percentage of invalid byte sequences in UTF-8, [4] so that text in any other encoding that uses bytes with the high bit set is extremely unlikely to pass a UTF-8 validity test. [3] However, badly written charset detection routines do not run the reliable UTF-8 test first, and may decide that UTF-8 is some other ...
[6] [7] [8] The Encoding Standard further stipulates that new formats, new protocols (even when existing formats are used) and authors of new documents are required to use UTF-8 exclusively. [9] Besides UTF-8, the following encodings are explicitly listed in the HTML standard itself, with reference to the Encoding Standard: [8]
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (July 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article compares Unicode encodings in two types of environments: 8-bit clean environments, and environments that forbid the use of byte values with the ...
As of Unicode version 16.0, there are 155,063 characters with code points, covering 168 modern and historical scripts, as well as multiple symbol sets.This article includes the 1,062 characters in the Multilingual European Character Set 2 subset, and some additional related characters.
Unicode equivalence is the specification by the Unicode character encoding standard that some sequences of code points represent essentially the same character. This feature was introduced in the standard to allow compatibility with pre-existing standard character sets, which often included similar or identical characters.
However, in character encodings used on modern devices such as UTF-8 or CP-1252, those codes are often used for other purposes, so only the 2-byte sequence is typically used. In the case of UTF-8, representing a C1 control code via the C1 Controls and Latin-1 Supplement block results in a different two-byte code (e.g. 0xC2,0x8E for U+008E ...
The UTF-8 representation of the BOM is the (hexadecimal) byte sequence EF BB BF. The Unicode Standard permits the BOM in UTF-8 , [ 4 ] but does not require or recommend its use. [ 5 ] UTF-8 always has the same byte order, [ 6 ] so its only use in UTF-8 is to signal at the start that the text stream is encoded in UTF-8, or that it was converted ...