Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada [2011] 2 S.C.R. 635, 2011 SCC 36 July 15, 2011 Whether bank liable to make payments to tax debtor when receiving cheques payable to tax debtor for deposit in account held jointly by tax debtor and third party Canada (AG) v PHS Community Services Society [2011] 3 S.C.R. 144, 2011 SCC 44 September 30, 2011
Indian Act and provincial gaming laws Smithers v R [1978] 1 SCR 506 May 17, 1977 criminal causation test Capital Cities Communications Inc v Canadian Radio-Television Commission [1978] 2 SCR 141 November 30, 1977 federal works and undertakings Quebec (AG) v Kellogg's Co of Canada [1978] 2 SCR 211 January 19, 1978 freedom of expression Arnold v Teno
Canadian corporate law concerns the operation of corporations in Canada, which can be established under either federal or provincial authority. Federal incorporation of for-profit corporations is governed by Corporations Canada under the Canada Business Corporations Act .
R v Goleski: 2015 SCC 6 Burden of proof of proving an "excuse" under s. 794(2) of the Criminal Code: Zurich Insurance Co v Chubb Insurance Co of Canada: 2015 SCC 19 Whether specific insurance company is an "insurer" for the purposes of Ontario statutory accident benefits scheme Caplin v Canada (Justice) 2015 SCC 32
Provisions similar to s. 210 of the UK Companies Act 1948 were first introduced into Canadian law through the 1975 passage of the Canada Business Corporations Act. [1] It incorporated recommendations made in 1962 by the UK Jenkins Committee on Company Law for removing the linkage of the remedy with that of winding-up and for broadening its scope. [2]
St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R [3] was the leading case on Aboriginal title in Canada for more than 80 years. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, affirming a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada, held that Aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the Crown's pleasure and could be taken away at any time.
The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada. In its decision Central and Eastern Trust Co v Irving Oil Ltd, [2] the mortgage was invalidated. Having lost the case, Central Trust brought an action against the lawyers for negligence and breach of contract. In their defence, Rafuse and Cordon claimed:
Canada (AG) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada 2015 SCC 7 [164] Whether Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act , as it applies to the legal profession, infringes the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and the right not to be deprived of liberty otherwise in accordance with principles of ...