enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intelligent design and science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design_and_science

    The intelligent design movement states that there is a debate among scientists about whether life evolved. The movement stresses the importance of recognizing the existence of this supposed debate, seeking to convince the public, politicians, and cultural leaders that schools should "Teach the Controversy". [1]

  3. Intelligent design - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

    The Discovery Institute says that a number of intelligent design articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals, [131] but critics, largely members of the scientific community, reject this claim and state intelligent design proponents have set up their own journals with peer review that lack impartiality and rigor, [n 28] consisting ...

  4. List of scientific bodies explicitly rejecting intelligent design

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_bodies...

    The Lehigh University Department of Biological Sciences responded to faculty member and intelligent design proponent Michael Behe's claims about the scientific validity and usefulness of intelligent design, publishing an official position statement which says "It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has ...

  5. Kansas evolution hearings - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_evolution_hearings

    The hearings were one of a number of Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns that sought to establish new science education standards consistent with conservative Christian beliefs, both in the state and nationwide, and reverse what they saw as a domination in science education by actual science, specifically the scientific theory of evolution, which they viewed as atheistic, in ...

  6. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area...

    Behe was professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and a leading intelligent design proponent who coined the term irreducible complexity and set out the idea in his 1996 book Darwin's Black Box. [26] As a primary witness for the defense, Behe was asked to support the idea that intelligent design was legitimate science.

  7. Phillip E. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillip_E._Johnson

    He was an opponent of evolutionary science, co-founder of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture (CSC), and one of the co-founders of the intelligent design movement, along with William Dembski and Michael Behe. [3] Johnson described himself as "in a sense the father of the intelligent design movement". [4]

  8. William A. Dembski - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Dembski

    William Albert Dembski (born July 18, 1960) is an American mathematician, philosopher and theologian.He was a proponent of intelligent design (ID) pseudoscience, [1] specifically the concept of specified complexity, and was a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture (CSC). [2]

  9. Santorum Amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santorum_Amendment

    Phillip E. Johnson, retired UC Berkeley law professor, leading proponent of intelligent design, founding advisor of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, and "father" of the intelligent design movement, assisted Santorum in phrasing the amendment. [3] [4] Johnson says that he is the author of the original amendment. [5]