Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An October 1998 revision to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1034 (10 USC 1034), the "Military Whistleblower Protection Act," contained significant changes in how the Military Department Inspectors General and Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Defense will process reprisal allegations. [5]
Public Laws 100-456, 102-190, and 103-337 (codified in Title 10, United States Code, Section 1034 (10 U.S.C. 1034) and implemented by DoD Directive 7050.6, "Military Whistleblower Protection," June 23, 2000) provide protections to members of the Armed Forces who make or prepare to make a lawful communication to a Member of Congress, an ...
Under the Freedom of Information Act, the NRO declassified a list of secret directives for internal use. The following is a list of the released directives, which are available for download: NROD 10-2 – "National Reconnaissance Office External Management Policy" NROD 10-4 – "National Reconnaissance Office Sensitive Activities Management Group"
The Department of Defense is composed of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and the Joint Staff (JS), Office of the Inspector General (DODIG), the Combatant Commands, the Military Departments (Department of the Army (DA), Department of the Navy (DON) & Department of the Air Force (DAF)), the Defense ...
The Marshals Service saw two pages removed, relating to correctional facility standards and fitness readiness requirements. [3] The National Law Enforcement Accountability Database, which tracked federal police officer misconduct, was removed as of February 20. [21]
JROC will now issue a directive to evaluate the capability gaps in the Missile defense review [218] of C2BMC as well as the Nuclear Posture Review. [ 219 ] In late December 2019, the Air Force, Army, and Navy ran a Joint all-domain command and control (JADC2) [ 220 ] [ 132 ] connection exercise of Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) [ 221 ...
The directive paused new accessions for individuals with gender dysphoria and halted all gender transition-related medical procedures, including scheduled and planned treatments, for service members. The directive emphasized that individuals with gender dysphoria would be treated with dignity and respect, while further policy guidance was expected.
The board submitted its final report to the Department of the Army on 20 August 1962, and it reached the Secretary of Defense on 15 September. [16] The report was a large document (two inches thick according to one source) [17] containing a number of recommendations in keeping with McNamara's original charge. The centerpiece of the report were ...