Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that San Antonio Independent School District's financing system, which was based on local property taxes, was not a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. [1]
Rodriguez Supreme Court case and indirectly in the United States v. Lopez Supreme Court case. In the 2016–2017 school year, about 5,050 students went from SAISD to charter schools , and in the last part of the 2017–2018 school year that number increased to about 10,100, while about 200 students living in SAISD were in other school districts.
Pages in category "United States education case law" ... San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez; Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe; Selman v ...
The court in that case has already found Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Bundy, and others liable for their false claims and campaign of harassment against St. Luke’s and its physicians and staff.
The civil lawsuit filed in Kern County Superior Court on Monday claims that BHS administration failed to act to prevent this incident, despite knowing that the student had a "history of danger ...
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973), a U.S. Supreme Court case that held that a school-financing system based on local property taxes was not an unconstitutional violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. Gannon v. Kansas, also known as Gannon v. State, a similar school funding lawsuit.
Far-right activist Ammon Bundy, who led the takeover of a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, an associate and three of their groups must pay over $50 million in damages for accusing a hospital of ...
One of the goals, in light of Brown v. Board of Education, was to promote equality in school funding, but this was specifically rejected by the Supreme Court in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973), which ruled that there was no inherent right to education in the United States. [2]