Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In statistics, a concordant pair is a pair of observations, each on two variables, (X 1,Y 1) and (X 2,Y 2), having the property that ...
In this example there are 395 concordant point pairs and 40 discordant point pairs, leading to a Kendall rank correlation coefficient of 0.816. Let ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , ( x n , y n ) {\displaystyle (x_{1},y_{1}),...,(x_{n},y_{n})} be a set of observations of the joint random variables X and Y , such that all the values of ( x i ...
The only pair that does not support the hypothesis are the two runners with ranks 5 and 6, because in this pair, the runner from Group B had the faster time. By the Kerby simple difference formula, 95% of the data support the hypothesis (19 of 20 pairs), and 5% do not support (1 of 20 pairs), so the rank correlation is r = .95 − .05 = .90 ...
Somers’ D takes values between when all pairs of the variables disagree and when all pairs of the variables agree. Somers’ D is named after Robert H. Somers, who proposed it in 1962. [1] Somers’ D plays a central role in rank statistics and is the parameter behind many nonparametric methods. [2]
In statistics, Goodman and Kruskal's gamma is a measure of rank correlation, i.e., the similarity of the orderings of the data when ranked by each of the quantities.It measures the strength of association of the cross tabulated data when both variables are measured at the ordinal level.
The denominator in the definition of can be interpreted as the total number of pairs of items. So, a high value in the numerator means that most pairs are concordant, indicating that the two rankings are consistent. Note that a tied pair is not regarded as concordant or discordant.
With <math>n=30<\math> points, there are a total of <math>\binom{30}{2} = 435<\math> possible point pairs. In this example there are 395 concordant point pairs and 40 discordant point pairs, leading to a Kendall rank correlation coefficient of 0.816.
Intuitively, the Spearman correlation between two variables will be high when observations have a similar (or identical for a correlation of 1) rank (i.e. relative position label of the observations within the variable: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) between the two variables, and low when observations have a dissimilar (or fully opposed for a ...