enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Non-compete clause - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause

   In contract law, a non-compete clause (often NCC), restrictive covenant, or covenant not to compete (CNC), is a clause under which one party (usually an employee) agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party (usually the employer).

3. Non-compete clauses in the United States - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clauses_in_the...

   Additionally, the law further codified the common law concerning non-compete agreements in that (1) a non-compete covenant must be no greater than is required for the protection of a legitimate business interest of the employer, (2) the non-compete covenant must not impose an undue hardship on the employee, and (3) the non-compete covenant must ...

4. Covenant (law) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)

   In property law, land-related covenants are called "real covenants", " covenants, conditions and restrictions " (CCRs) or "deed restrictions" and are a major form of covenant, typically imposing restrictions on how the land may be used (negative covenants) or requiring a certain continuing action (affirmative covenant).

5. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

   www.aol.com/restrictive-covenant-used-today-nc...

   In real estate, a restrictive covenant is a rule or condition placed on a property that outlines what homeowners can and cannot do with their land. These covenants are legally binding and often ...

6. Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidson_Bros.,_Inc._v._D...

   Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (App. Div. 1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.

7. There are 4,000 racist housing covenants in Pierce County ...

   www.aol.com/news/4-000-racist-housing-covenants...

   Largely dating back to the 1930s, ’40s and ’50s, the outdated covenants stretch from north to south, and many places in between. | A Matt Driscoll column ... 24/7 Help. For premium support ...

8. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

   Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.

9. Impact of racially restrictive covenants seen in current ...

   www.aol.com/news/impact-racially-restrictive...

   "The practice of racially restrictive covenants is a clear example of systemic racism," Golden Valley City Attorney Maria Cisneros said during an online forum on the topic hosted by In the City ...