Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying immigration and naturalization law. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level.
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen: 20-843: 2022-06-23 New York’s proper-cause requirement for obtaining an unrestricted license to carry a concealed firearm violates the Fourteenth Amendment in that it prevents law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and ...
United States v. Texas, et al. [a] is a court case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding Texas Senate Bill 4, a statute allowing state officials to arrest and deport migrants.
Texas' controversial immigration law is on hold again after court moves that confounded the Biden administration and spurred outrage from Mexico's government.
The majority made a new finding that the Immigration and Nationality Act "flatly does not permit" deferred action. [29] Judge Carolyn Dineen King dissented, arguing that prosecutorial discretion makes the case non- justiciable , and that there had been "no justification" for the circuit court's delay in the ruling.
Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 83.3% 55/66 6 5 1 4 16 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 57.6% 38/66 7 4 3 11 25 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 66.7% 44/66 6 2 1 7 16 Associate Justice: Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump: April 7, 2017 75.8% 50/66 7 6 0 8 21 ...
The ruling was 6-3, with the conservative justices in the majority and liberal justices dissenting. “Chevron is overruled,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.
United States v. Hansen, 599 U.S. 762 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case about whether a federal law that criminalizes encouraging or inducing illegal immigration is unconstitutionally overbroad, violating the First Amendment right to free speech.